Our Works
Hardwood timber is among the valuable natural resources in Tanzanian natural forests. Thus, responsibly harvesting and selling hardwood timber species presents a significant potential revenue earner for the local forest-dependent rural communities, provided that: (a) sufficient stocks of large trees remain on village lands, and (b) they secure a fair price per unit of timber sold.
Rural communities which have taken control of their forests by legally setting aside Village Land Forest Reserves (VLFRs) are in a better position to benefit from selling the timber contained within them. This is because the revenues generated by selling forest products are fully retained by the village council (i.e. none is paid in royalties to the central government). This acts as a financial incentive for local people to manage their forests responsibly.
It is not enough, however, for a village to simply have
timber for sale; as with other commercial goods, local people need to
identify markets with sufficient demand in order to sell their timber.
This is a task that rural communities in Tanzania do not always have
sufficient capacity to achieve. In the absence of buyers, communities
struggle to generate real benefits from managing their natural timber
resources which, in turn, can curtail local efforts to conserve
forests.
At MCDI, we not only support communities to set up VLFRs under
Participatory Forest Management but, once this is achieved, we help them
to generate income through timber sales. We do this by:
- Supporting villages to identify markets and buyers for their timber, including providing training on sales and marketing strategies;
- Certifying community forests with the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) to drive timber sales;
- Facilitating sales transactions by liaising with and providing technical and logistical support to forest managers (the communities), timber buyers, and other stakeholders throughout the timber harvesting process.
Governance & Capacity Building
Transparent Decision Making
Communities themselves decide how their forest resources
should be managed, while MCDI supports this process by strengthening
local governance and accountability.
We support village councils to implement effective and transparent
governance systems that promote community-wide engagement in decisions
over how their forest resources should be managed. For example, locally
preferred models for distributing revenues from forest product sales are
agreed upon during community-wide meetings known as village general
assemblies, and documented in village forest management plans and
bylaws.
Regular village general assembly meetings are an important governance
tool in Tanzanian communities. Village councils are required by law to
hold these meetings on a quarterly basis, and they should be attended by
at least two thirds of voting-aged adults. This is important for
democratic decision making that actively considers the needs of all
local stakeholders.
Governing Forest Revenues
In all of our partner communities, the profits generated
from sustainable timber sales in local forests are put into a fund
managed by the village council for local development projects. We
provide one-on-one coaching and support to local leaders in managing
these communal development funds. For example, we help to guide them as
they develop annual work plans and budgets to ensure that these are
clearly aligned with the long term vision and goals set by each
community in their village development plan.
These work plans and budgets are then presented for approval by the
wider community during village general assembly meetings. Whenever
possible, we attend quarterly village general assembly meetings to help
ensure that annual reports, work plans and budgets are clearly presented
and that the concerns of all local stakeholders are equally considered
in decision making. We place a strong emphasis on incorporating the
needs of marginalised groups, such as youth, women and residents from
sub-villages.
As a result, forest revenues have been used in a variety ways that have
broad-based benefits for entire communities, and that are relevant to
the particular needs of the village where they have been implemented.
What is Community Forestry?
With numerous overlapping threats to natural forests a
solution is required that will provide long term protection for these
forests and a sustainable utilization of forest based resources. With
limited resources from the Government, the people best able to exert
some control over the forests are the rural communities who live and
around them. However, the question then becomes: why should they
care?
At MCDI we are addressing this question by helping rural communities
find concrete reasons to support sustainable forest management. In
particular, we are helping communities gain access, control and user
rights over their forests so that they can gain economic benefits from
the natural resources that surround them, incentivizing communities to
promote forest conservation.
For communities to reap the benefits from forest resources, they must
first have rights and ownership over their forest. Fortunately, Tanzania
has a favourable policy framework that supports community-based forest
management which is known as Participatory Forest Management (PFM).
Under this framework, communities are able to set aside areas as Village
Land Forest Reserves (VLFRs) managed by the Village Council and Village
Natural Resource Committee, thereby clarifying local tenure over forest
resources on village lands. However, the process to establish a
formalized VLFR is costly and takes time. At MCDI we are assisting
communities undergo the process to establish a formal VLFR, enabling
them to take ownership over their forest resources then support them for
sustainable utilization of forest based resources.
Our strategy to achieve this is based on a number of key supporting building blocks:
- Meeting climate changes goals- MCDI is putting more efforts on facilitating rural communities to responsibly manage community owned forests that gives incentives and benefits to climate and natural resources. This is crucial to achieve global climate goals.
- The high economic value of mpingo makes it an excellent flagship species for conservation.
- Growing concerns about the dubious legality of wood entering Western markets (especially the USA and the EU) has prompted new regulations pressurising timber buyers to find demonstrably legal sources.
- Forest certification allows the communities we support to securely label their timber as legally and sustainably felled, and from a responsibly managed forest.
- New international voluntary carbon markets are prepared to pay forest managers to safeguard the carbon locked up in their forests.
Why certify forests
Once communities have secured rights and control over
their forests, they begin identifying and engaging with income
generating opportunities that provide benefits directly to the
communities themselves. Getting a fair price for forest products, such
as timber, is critical if communities are to reap maximum benefits from
their forests. Competition from unregulated sources prevents rural
communities from realising the true value of their timber.
Forest certification allows one to securely label forest products as
having been legally felled from well managed forests, and thus to
differentiate them from other products from less ethically managed
sources. Forest certification also includes a system to monitor the
supply chain by which a log is turned into a finished product. If, and
only if, every company along the supply chain holds a Chain of Custody
certificate from the certificate issuing authority, then the final
product can also be certified, and consumers can be confident that the
product they are buying contains no uncertified wood.
Our FSC Group Certificate
We hold the first and so far the only FSC™ certificate for community-managed natural forest in Africa. Twenty communities currently participate in this scheme, with 277,096 hectares of forest certified as ethically and sustainably managed
In March 2009 we were awarded a certificate by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)™ for the community managed natural forests we support in South-Eastern Tanzania. The certificate awarded is a group certificate, meaning that the actual forests are managed by group members - in this case rural communities - and the certificate manager (MCDI) manages the relationship with the certificate issuer, FSC
The group certificate design is efficient, as the costs of certification are spread between all members. Furthermore, new members can be added without requiring a separate inspection by FSC-accredited auditors so long as MCDI follows the rules it has agreed with FSC for adding new members. Our certificate code is SA-FM/COC-002151, which can be labelled as FSC on certified produce that have come from group certified forests.
Group Certificate Members
The table below lists all current members of our FSC group certificate, and the documents available on each member. All group members are rural communities whose first language is Swahili, hence all these documents are written in Swahili. MCDI is happy to provide translations where required. However, non-Swahili speakers interested in specifics may find it useful first to check the relevant templates found under the Certificate Administration section.
| MN | Village | FI | Forest Name | Area (ha) | Date Joined | Forest Management Plan (FMP) |
| 1 | Kikole | A | Namajongoo | 916 | Oct-2008 | Namajongoo |
| 2 | Kisangi | A | Mwembendawile | 1,966 | Oct-2008 | Mwembendawile |
| 3 | Nainokwe | A | Kijawa A - Miti | 8,502 | Nov-2010 | Kijawa A - Miti |
| 4 | Nainokwe | B | Kijawa B | 1,629 | Sep-2017 | Kijawa B |
| 5 | Nainokwe | C | Kijawa C | 2,155 | Jul-2021 | Kijawa C |
| 6 | Liwiti | A | Namatuli | 10,520 | Aug-2010 | Namatuli |
| 7 | Nanjirinji A | A | Mbumbila A | 57,641 | Sep-2012 | Mbumbila A |
| 8 | Nanjirinji A | B | Mbumbila B | 18,889 | Aug-2016 | Mbumbila B |
| 9 | Likawage | A | Lung’ou | 31,055 | Nov-2013 | Lung’ou |
| 10 | Ngea | A | Likonde | 3,330 | Dec-2014 | Likonde |
| 11 | Mchakama | A | Uchungwa | 5,639 | Dec-2014 | Uchungwa |
| 12 | Namatewa | A | Magongo | 6,656 | Jul-2017 | Magongo |
| 13 | Namatewa | B | Mbarale | 3,359 | Jul-2017 | Mbarale |
| 14 | Tawi | A | Tawi | 3,003 | Dec-2010 | Tawi |
| 15 | Sautimoja | A | Chihuruka | 21,966 | Dec-2015 | Chihuruka |
| 16 | Machemba | A | Chiumbe | 4,612 | Dec-2015 | Chiumbe |
| 17 | Mindu | A | Liwina | 3,713 | Nov-2018 | Liwina |
| 18 | Ngapa | A | Mgalugalu | 16,855 | Aug-2019 | Mgalugalu |
| 19 | Nahoro | A | Kokoliko | 20,906 | May-2021 | Kokoliko |
| 20 | Nandenje | A | Matete | 5,025 | May-2021 | Matete |
| 21 | Barikiwa | A | Liboya | 19,268 | Jun-2022 | Liboya |
| 22 | Mtawatawa | A | Mbila | 12,391 | Jun-2023 | Mbila |
| 23 | Kitogoro | A | Nakipome | 8,275 | Nov-2023 | Nakipome |
| 24 | Nangano | A | Unguungu | 8,825 | Oct-2023 | Unguungu |
Group Certificate Members Documents
The following documents are available for members of the MCDI FSC group certificate:
- ED 10 Sexual harassment and discrimination Guideline
- ED01 FMC Group Administration Manual V.8
- ED02 Group Guidelines on Forest Assessment and Sustainable Harvesting V 2.0
- ED03 VNRC Forest Management Training Curriculum v1.0
- ED04 Forest Monitoring Procedures Manual v3.2
- ED05 Explanation of Applicable FSC Principles and Criteria V2.0 (English)
- SD01 Rules of Membership V.7.0 (swahili)
- SD07 Procedures for Timber Harvesting V2.2 (English)
- SD08 Complaints & Appeals Procedure V3.0 (swahili)
